Why Are The Worlds Greatest Brands Stuck In Old Technology And What Should They Do About It?

The other day a friend of mine brought H&M’s global website to my attention again. Back in 2006 I was one of their consultants until I more or less lost the assignment due to the fact that I told them what the didn’t wanna hear – Your website sucks! Of course I was wrong and they were right. After all, they’ve been awarded time after time at major advertising shows (Thanks to among others to me and the team I worked with back then) so why wouldn’t they know what they are doing.

This is exactly where the problem start for most major brands – at ad awards like Cannes Lions, Eurobest, Clio and others where people with no understanding for how to build an online presence beyond Adobe Flash and cool animations take these monsters to new heights. Back in 2007 I was also a part of building these kind of platforms for major brands but behind closed doors I constantly tried to convince my clients that sticking to these worn out technologies was nothing but stupid.

Let’s take a look at couple of major players and have a quick look at their online presence.

The Online Nike Store

The Nike Store

The online store belonging to the worlds leading sports brand. All built in Flash…in 2010

Nike has always been among the first brands to adapt to change. Back in 1999 when I took part in pitching them into Framfab they were even heading the pack.

At first glance it all looks great. The site design is inspired by blogging with that clear and present left hand menu hanging there. But once you start looking deeper it’s a mess. The entire store is built in flash which is just plain stupid. To Nike’s defense I’ll ad that they launched the store in this costume around 2005 when Flash was the hottest thing around. However that’s not the case…since 3 years back. Until a couple of month ago the first page on Nike.com was also dressed in Flash but now they’ve changed that.

Nike.com is filled with fantastic content that people would love to get their hands on. Take Nike+ as an example, a fantastic running community that would have been spread engaged people hundred times more if they’ve built an open platform that allowed the community to truly contribute. However, today the Nike+ site like most of the other sites is locked up deep down in custom made solutions that doesn’t make it easy for people to speed the brand.

The adidas digital presence

The adidas global site

As you might know I was working with adidas for a full 8 years. During those years I Creative Directed and took part in launching 59 global digital advertising campaigns for the brand. I also took part in developing their global site and their intranet.

In 2006 we launched the adidas global campaign for the World Cup held in Germany. Around this time I started to raise the question about leaving the flash platform. All results pointed in the direction that Flash, that was and is a wonderful platform when it comes to creating cool rich media sites, didn’t meet any of the demands that the users had. People came looking for products, videos, TVC’s, exclusives and more – but they did not want was to load heavy content, use unique navigation, not being able to bookmark specific pages or share specific content with their friends.

I continued to work with adidas until 2008 but never managed to convince them to leave the flash platform. Instead they listened to another agency that managed to talk them into rebuilding their global website with flash as the main tool. In 2008 they launched the new adidas.com, the same site you’ll see today and it was already in 2008 a step backwards, today it’s more of an artifact that they instead should burn on a disc and give away to Wikimedia as an historic time stamp.

The Rolex Global Brand Site

The Global Rolex Site

The Rolex site. I full on Flash site that demands a state of the art computer and broadband connection

Oh god how I loved this full-screen flash site when it was launched in 2007. It was state of the art and even though I started to abandon working with flash sites at the time I still felt that this served Rolex purpose. Now 3 years later I’m on the contrary sure it serves no purpose at all.

The thing with these sites made entirely in flash is the fact that they don’t do anything that cannot be done in HTML and frankly they can’t do some of things you can in HTML 5. The most important thing though is that when you build things in flash you’ve gotta cater for the SEO/SEM manually by customizing the platform.

A Car Site – Volkswagen

Volkswagen has since 2007 been going with flash all over the place. It was a bad decision then and still is.

I just took Volkswagen as an example. Every car brand seems lost in flash and big ass animations when you visit the campaign sites. Kind of strange since all we want is tons of short videos and photos of the cars. After all, we’re supposed to make a decision to buy a 50000$ car based on this information…

The Global H&M Site

The Global H&M website

The global H&M site all built in flash back in 2006. It takes you 4 minutes on an ok connection to even reach the right information.

I don’t even know where to start. It’s just plain stupid. The H&M site uses flash but in a way so that it could all have been built on HTML4 technology. There’s simply no logical reason at all why this site should work like this. I took part in launching Viktor & Rolf in 2006, Kylie in 2007, Summer of Surf and more for H&M years ago. Back then we had discussions where I told H&M they should throw the entire platform out and get new technology in. That was of course not appreciated and as we ended up being forced into creating flash sites we decided to drop H&M as a client in 2008.

The Microsoft Web Site

The global Micosoft web site

These guys got their first page covered in an animated Silverlight banner even thought they announced the wouldn’t continue develop this platform. Say no more… (Updated, just before I was about to press the publish button they actually removed the Silverlight technology from the first page)

Microsoft are strange. They more or less have the same site they had back in 2001 or something. They’re stuck with Verdana and a monster of a site. I bet that somewhere in that big ass company there’s a manager responsible for the site saying things like “It’s just to much information, we just cannot change this site” I say 85% of it is shit. Throw the site away and start off fresh!

So, why does’nt worlds best brands get online communication right? There are of course lots of reasons but I want to share 5 thoughts on the subject.

Old management

This is of course the number one problem. The guys and girls that are running these brands have in most cases been brought up in their business life before the Internet existed. This means they’ve learned how the world of communication works without the now most important component – The Internet. Having these people lead your brand Is like hiring an architect that doesn’t know 3D or CAD. They simply don’t know better.

The Ad Award problem

So, most of the people who manage these brands most likely send their stuff to ad awards. And most ad awards juries in the world are filled with advertising people who don’t give a damn about results. They go for the four F. Flash, Fun, Friends and Finalists. This means Flash as in sound and cool animations that more or less looks like the TVC the jury people love to see. Fun as in games, crazy solutions and humor. Friends as in awarding agencies and foremost people they know from start. Finally finalists as in – if another award show awarded the contribution, something must be right.

Stuck in technology

Most major brands have invested in huge content management systems. Interwoven, Sharepoint, SDL, Polypoly and Episerver among others. These systems were built by consultants aiming to lock you in and they were built for old web thinking. Many editors and many pages. Now when suddenly you wanna change technology or change how your digital presence is built up, these brands have to change their strategy entirely. This turns IT managers and brand managers into people afraid of change since that would mean they threw 1 million Euro on something useless. Thinking like that is of course wrong since were living in uncertain times where you don’t have a clue what’s right or wrong in 3 years apart from the fact that you will probably be wrong. Sticking to open source products and constantly iterating your online presence is the solution.

Wrong consultants

Most web agencies and advertising agencies out there have staffed their companies with people who can do wonders with Flash and .Net based platforms. Then suddenly you’re supposed to have people on your team who can rock PHP, MySql, Ruby, Python, Cassandra, Java, Jquery and other technologies that most IT departments hate on top of that.

Brand managers not understanding technology

Some of you will think I’m plain stupid. A brand manager shouldn’t need to understand technology. But I have different opinion. Personally I’d always prioritize knowledge about technology over knowledge about brands since all brand will be built on technology in the future and the wrong decisions from a digital point of view will have a greater negative impact on the brand compared to non technical decisions. After all, the world is filled with consultants who really know traditional branding while the other breed is hard to find.

Last but not least – CEO’s that just doesnt get it.

I’ve written a long post about these dinosaurs before. Go read it ››

So, if you’re heading a brand or a company. Here are 7 things you should do asap to get your brand moving into the digital future.

1. Never let an advertising agency steer how you do digital communication

Always initiate projects with the digital communication aspects first. It’s not very hard for offline activities to support online when they’re planned. The other way around thought is practically impossible.

2. Leave Flash. Leave Silverlight.

From a user point of view (based on how people really use the Internet) the is nothing, absolutely nothing, that motives the use of these technologies.

3. Change platform from your propriety platform.

The sooner you move all your digital assets to open sourced and MySql based ones such as WordPress, Drupal or others, the better!

4. Make sure you socially integrate the spreading of your content on most major social platforms.

Start by checking up on Brian Solis and JESS3 Conversation Prism. Video, Sound, Events, Documents, Live Streaming, Podcast, Images, Social Networks, Intranets, Extranets, CRM. It’s all to be found there as I wrote about the other day.

5. Provide people with true values

Once people end up on your site they are there for the products. They don’t wanna play around with games and shit. Products and services, that’s what you sell. If they’ve found you, your advertising has done the job – start selling!

6. Search should steer everything you do

Face it. People Google everything so make sure your platform is built to lure the Google robots into bed.

7. Don’t fear loosing your job.

Only fear doing things that doesn’t do any good for your brand. That will most surely get you a new one of you have one of those dinosaur bosses!

Go change now!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Curiosity. My greatest asset. Born 1971 and Raised in the suburbs of style city Stockholm, creativity was always a part of growing up. I'm one of Sweden’s most hired speakers and authorities in the field of modern creative and conceptual thinking and skill of innovating brands and their communication.

  • http://nabillionaire.se Nabil El Alaoui Sossey

    Big brands like Nike and Adidas don’t really need the search engine exposure. They’re already enormous!

    But I still don’t like flash. It’s unnecessary and takes forever to load if you’re stuck with a slow connection.

    I, just like you, think that all major companies should implement HTML-based solutions instead. Flash just isn’t that cool.

    As a matter of fact, I believe there’s more cons than pros when it comes to flash.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    I think you’re wrong here. They don’t need search engine exposure on top levels. But when people search for totally different things not necessarily associated with the actual brand there’s definitely advantages. And given the fact that most of the brands start their own e-commerce journey it’s even more important.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    ps. Thanks for the comment!

  • http://twitter.com/Omerosen Omer Rosenbaum

    I must say that I am surprised that some advertising agencies in Sweden still don’t hire a full time people for that exact matter and prefer to outsource it to more specilized agencies.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Ah, that was PE. Totally agree!

  • http://twitter.com/FredrikReinius Fredrik Reinius

    Great article. Whats interesting is that brands like H&M are actually also using smaller agile agencies to create campaign style sites like Lanvin for H&M and You art here by H&M on WordPress and very socially connected. Built by Awkward in Sthlm.

    Small steps but I guess they`ll be coming around soon and I agree, HM.com is horrible. :)

  • Pingback: Rekommenderat (27 Nov) | Reklam2

  • Anonymous

    Volkswagen UK has a more or less identical html fallback version of their flash site, check out with javascript turned off (or an iPad or iPhone…) http://www.volkswagen.co.uk/#/new/golf-gti-vi and they are using SWF address to get deep linking. Makes me wonder though why they even bother with the flash version and how much they spent on a technical advanced solution like this.

  • http://sebastianostman.com Sebastian Östman

    Even the biggest brands want to get found. They need SEO, maybe not as much as a small company but why in the world would you make a website based on flash in 2010??

    Very very good blogpost!!!

  • http://jesperastrom.com Jesper Åström

    There is just so much to say that cannot be said. Problem with the deep linking below is the hashtag in the url, the lack of redirecting old content such as campaign websites and the never ending story of not wanting to use their websites as a communicative tool rather than a display ad.

    To some extent I would like to add something to the “don’t fear loosing your job” thing, which is to “try sticking around though”… I mean, if real change is to come about, then someone has to take the debate from the inside which usually means having to stick around although you hate your job. ;)

  • http://twitter.com/Omerosen Omer Rosenbaum

    Damn you Disqus, it cuts the comment on Twitter. Why don’t they add chracater counter?

  • http://webbprinsessan.wordpress.com Webbprinsessan

    Word. I think you are so right. Coming from the corporate world I live with this and in these boundries investments can have and obstacles created for implementing for example SEO. And what I find interesting is the SEO-perspective when awarding sites. In the recent Internet World (Swedish) list of top-100 websites many are in Flash or majority of the site is in Flash. And. Instead of adding the SEO-perspective as one criteria (at least not an important one) for the list they did a separate list with sites with good SEO-implementation! Glossy, shiny and beutiful are more important words than usability in most cases. http://www.lindex.com is another example where I got really frustrated as a customer trying to find a specific thing but all navigations are built on inspirational buzz words. And this site got a fairly high position (20-something if I remember correctly) in the list mentioned above. Anyway, great articla and to the point. Thanks!

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Agree! I wish I had time for a 2 hours video analysis of each and everyone of these sites from a SEO, communication, business and usability perspective…

    We should do a Christmas show you and me!

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Thanks Anna!

    Agree, the Top 100 this year missed out on a lot of different sites that should have been there while awarding others that should not have been there.

    Lindex is as you say yet another example of these wrongly built sites!

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Thanks!

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Which in one sense is fine. But I bet that stops them from launching new things in seconds. We did these things for adidas in 2004 already. But only cause we thought Flash served the audience better. Once I found out over the years I decided to never again recommend that kind of solution.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    They’ve obviously are doing something right here and there. But on the other hand, all the value they’re building from a SEO perspective is thrown away on short term domains such as: http://www.yourarthere.com so from a strategic point of view they still haven’t got it….

  • http://codebyko.se Karl Oskar Mattsson

    As a computer geek my heart is yours.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    :)

  • http://jesperastrom.com Jesper Åström

    Agree!

  • http://twitter.com/mo_lishomwa Mo Lishomwa

    agree with you Johan on search.
    No matter how huge a brand may be there is depth to their consumers and what they are doing..unfortunately the brands themselves sometimes buy into their own enormity and think scratching the surface is enough. That surface may be search, or using flash simply because its shiny…like all the other comms channels they may use!

  • http://secretswede.net/ Hessam Lavi

    You are spot on about working with the “wrong consultants” – learning new technologies is hard and costs time and money, so why change if you make money from delivering Flash sites?! One sad fact is that many web developers unfortunately lack a basic understanding of how search engines work and hence start to shiver when “SEO” is mentioned. In one sense I see where they are coming from (shady SEOs…) but this has to change since one of the main pillars of building search engine friendly websites is accessibility which is a major drawback of Flash. The common misunderstanding among creative agencies imo seems to be that you *either* create a appealing/captivating/interesting/etc website, or you build one which is optimized for search engines (i.e. no Flash). In reality this is not a mutually exclusive decision.

    I recently wrote about the overuse of Flash in the world of fashion. One of the odd things I found is that H&M for instance already has a non-Flash version in place and it looks *exactly* the same as the Flash version which doesn’t make any sense!

    If you are interested, you can find a few other terrible examples as well as some who’ve managed to create attractive websites without Flash (e.g. http://www.filippa-k.com/ with WordPress) here:
    http://secretswede.net/seo/problems-with-using-flash-on-fashion-brand-websites/

  • Rasmus Almqvist

    The biggest issue with major corporations is that they spend a lot of time (and money) ‘talking to you’… which is understandable as that’s what they have been groomed to do – but what if what they are telling me is irrelevant to me?!

    My advice; make you brand relevant by engaging in a dialogue with different subsegments of your customerbase – dont try speak with one voice to everyone.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Good comment. Yet another thing of the past :D

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Good comment. Yet another thing of the past :D

  • http://twitter.com/overodder Jonas Overödder

    Great post! What would be seriously interesting is another blog post with good examples meeting the same criteria you´re mentioning above. But in a positive way, so to say…

    Thanks again for inspiring!

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Thank you for that comment :)

    I’d say an analysis of Apple.com would do the job. The are doing many things right. Then you have sites like Amazon that from one angle look like shit but outperforms most sites. And imagine, Amazon has been around since the middle of the 90s

  • Separovic

    Good article and a difficult message to deliver to clients with money.
    However i would add that Jakob Nielsen has been saying the same thing since the late 90’s. See useit.com. It really is great to see that people like yourself involved in high profile projects are getting into the true value of HTML and the basic principle function has the largest audience impact. Its about the lowest common denominator.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Absolutely. But if you look at how Jakob said it, he also thought graphics should more or less be excluded. I’ve followed Jakob for a long time and among other things he, around 2005 did specials on how to build corporate brand sites in Flash….so, Jakob got caught up in it too.

    My favorite quote though: “People spend more time on other sites”

    ronnestam.com
    Leading brands into the future of communication

    Johan Ronnestam
    johan@ronnestam.com
    mobile: +46 70 654 90 10
    Twitter: ronnestam

    For insights into the future – read my blog http://www.ronnestam.com

  • Pingback: Inspirerad av Ronnestam. Varför är många varumärken fast i gamla kommunikationsstrategier? | annsikrol

  • http://twitter.com/chrisjangelov chrisjangelov

    “Having these people lead your brand Is like hiring an architect that doesn’t know 3D or CAD. ”
    Me: Very good. I’ll use that one :-)

    I think one reason it’s hard to come across with the SEO-argument is that these people now have discovered Adwords as the modern solution to all marketing needs. Try to say “organic listing” and they say you can’t get to the top three that way, so why spend money on that?

  • Pierre Lindstedt

    Let´s hope you´ll like the new global platform/Site Design we will launch Dec-10 to March-11. Yes, with a little help from Jesper Åström. /Pierre Lindstedt, H&M

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Looking forward to that ;)

  • Georg Westin

    Good article but I think you make it a bit too simplified. Juat throwing something away and start over can in cases work but if it is an advanced platform it will like in our case, more than 2 years to start over, the cost and the loss in momentum for the business is not barable.

    Using open source is usually a good idea I agree but it is not for the case that it does not lock you into a corner because it can, the day when the project is not “hip” anymore and the developers leave the project it is not so fun anymore and you have the options to take over the source code or try to jump on the next cool thing.

    I think it is better to move forward by first modularizing the old platform you have, break out the functionality into systems, jars or whatever, have a set architectural integrety plan and then start improving them with the latest technology longside with the development of new business items from the backlog, this is something you can sell into management quite easy.

    Regards Georg Westin

  • http://twitter.com/Panajot Panajot Jelev

    How true! a brilliant article! there is nothing more to comment.

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Thanks! And thanks for sharing via your Twitter account!

  • http://www.ronnestam.com/ Johan Ronnestam

    Hey Georg,

    As usual I’m simplifying things here since I merely try to wake people up and not solve the problem, that’s what I do when I consult for clients. However, one comment. I don’t think you have to look at 2 years to start over. You could definitely turn a brand like Nike and adidas around in 1 year. And honestly, that doesn’t really have anything to do with the problem. You can’t really say we cannot change this cause it takes time – then it’s even more important to get going :)

    Personally I’d build the stuff on the side and then switch. Most old platforms are so old so the actual code steers you in the wrong direction.

  • Pingback: So What About Volvo? Does Your Site Suck Too? — Blog of Ronnestam

  • Pingback: Can a CMS supplier really truthfully grade itself on SEO? « Webbprinsessan

  • Pingback: Interesting – January 12, 2011 - JAKERI

  • Pingback: Integrated Communication and Advertising From A Digital Perspective — Blog of Ronnestam

  • Pingback: Top 100 Posts On The Future Of Communication by Johan Ronnestam Posted Between 2005 and 2011 — Blog of Ronnestam

  • Pingback: Can a CMS supplier really truthfully grade itself on SEO? « Anna P aka Triathlonmamman aka Webbprinsessan