<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog of Ronnestam &#187; 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ronnestam.com/tag/2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ronnestam.com</link>
	<description>Innovative communication and advertising from Sweden with love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.ronnestam.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Mashable bet $2500 on a social design party while good old Sweden throws 1.3 million on the fire.</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/mashable-bet-2500-on-a-social-design-party-while-good-old-sweden-throws-13-million-on-the-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronnestam.com/mashable-bet-2500-on-a-social-design-party-while-good-old-sweden-throws-13-million-on-the-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronnestam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just another day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The trend is my friend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dagens media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european presidency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[per torberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pers värld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day I was happy to see that Per Torberger, former writer at Resume, one of Swedens leading media papers, had kick started his blog Pers Värld. Welcome back Per! One of Per’s first post highlighted the ongoing Swedish discussion about the new 2009 Swedish European Presidency logo made by Bacon. Both Resume and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap">T</span>he other day I was happy to see that Per Torberger, former writer at Resume, one of Swedens leading media papers, had kick started his blog <a href="http://www.persvarld.se/" target="_blank">Pers Värld</a>. Welcome back Per!</p>
<p><span class="drop_cap">O</span>ne of Per’s first post highlighted the ongoing Swedish discussion about the new <a href="http://se2009.eu/" target="_blank">2009 Swedish European Presidency</a> logo made by Bacon. Both <a href="http://resume.se/nyheter/2009/03/02/eu-logga-for-1-3-miljoner/" target="_blank">Resume</a> and <a href="http://capdesign.idg.se/2.990/1.215320/loggan-som-ska-fronta-sveriges-ordforandeskap-i-eu---sa-gjordes-den" target="_blank">Cap &amp; Design</a>, <a href="http://aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article4537290.ab" target="_blank">mainstream</a> <a href="http://www.svd.se/nyheter/politik/euvalet2009/artikel_2539175.svd" target="_blank">media</a> and <a href="http://johanwigmo.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/sverigeloggan/" target="_blank">a</a> <a href="http://robertmacli.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/pengar-i-sjon/" target="_blank">lot</a> <a href="http://www.kreafon.se/blog/2009/03/05/vad-kostar-en-logotyp/" target="_blank">of</a> <a href="http://knuff.se/q/eu+logga" target="_blank">Swedish</a> <a href="http://eutext.blogspot.com/2009/03/sveriges-eu-logga-infor.html" target="_blank">blogs</a> <a href="http://krohniskt.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/snygg-eu-symbol/" target="_blank">have</a> highlighted <a href="http://blogg.svd.se/reklammedier?id=12258" target="_blank">the</a> <a href="http://resume.se/nyheter/2009/03/03/det-ar-inte-en-tennisboll/" target="_blank">news</a>. Dagens Media, another Swedish media paper got <a href="http://dagensmedia.se/mallar/dagensmedia_mall.asp?version=221299" target="_blank">an ongoing poll</a> going where 83% thinks SEK 1.3 million is to much for the logo.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone frame size-full wp-image-2115" title="sweden_2009_presidency2009eu_logo" src="http://www.ronnestam.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sweden_2009_presidency2009eu_logo.jpg" alt="sweden_2009_presidency2009eu_logo" width="480" height="328" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.persvarld.se/2009/03/09/hur-mycket-ar-design-vart/" target="_blank">Per posted his thoughts in Swedish</a>, and focused on replying to what most people seemed to comment about. Bear with me as I try to translate to you guys who don’t read Swedish.</p>
<p>(freely translated from Per&#8217;s blog)</p>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>”Wow, SEK 1,3 million for a logo &#8211; how the hell can it cost so much!?”</li>
<li> ”No, it looks like Stockholm Opens (tennis tournament) old logo/other logo” or “It’s ugly”</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>Per didn’t seem to think that SEK 1.3 million for the new logo was to much. And mostly concluded <span id="more-2116"></span>that people who commented on the logo were focusing on the wrong things and not really understanding that design is first and foremost about differentiating a brand rather than decorating it.</p>
<p>I first made a short comment on Per&#8217;s blog where I said the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It would have been really exciting if one had launched a competition for about 1000$ on 99designs.com, spend 10 hours on writing a good brief. After use up another 10 hours to Art Direct the contributions.</p>
<p>You would probably have seen 200-300 contributions of which 30-50 would have been good. Spend another 20 hours finetuning the work. The final check would then have been SEK 100-200 000 and crowdsourced. This would have been a cool case that in it’s turn would have generated more attention in both Sweden and abroad.</p>
<p>Is the logo ugly? &#8211; no point of view. Ugly can be good, beautiful can be bad in these cases.<br />
Is it expensive? &#8211; No, not if you hire a traditional agency and use a traditional way of producing it.</p>
<p>Pling.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="drop_cap">A</span>fter some bouncing back and forth Per asked for a real case. Right after his last comment yesterday, as sent from the gods came this:</p>
<p>To celebrate the launch of their new website and branding the splendid ever source of information <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/03/10/remix-mashable-design-contest/" target="_blank">Mashable launches a social design competition</a> on <a href="http://99designs.com/contests/18987" target="_blank">99designs</a> where their visitors are <a href="http://99designs.com/contests/18987/brief" target="_blank">briefed</a> to &#8216;mash up&#8217; the Mashable logo.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone frame size-full wp-image-2134" title="mashable_99designs_competition" src="http://www.ronnestam.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/mashable_99designs_competition.jpg" alt="mashable_99designs_competition" width="480" height="416" /></p>
<p>Mashable didn’t dare to re-do their real logo, or at least not yet. But they did launch a competition. When I started to write this post they had <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>15</em></span> logos uploaded. Now as I’m getting to the end of this post they&#8217;ve got <span style="text-decoration: underline;">67</span>! contributions and tons of conversation going on. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">67</span> in just a couple of hours!</p>
<p>The <a href="http://99designs.com/contests/18987" target="_blank">competition</a> goes on for another 2 weeks and I actually think we’ll see thousands rather than hundreds of contributions.</p>
<p>Rock on Mashable!</p>
<h3>Let&#8217;s sum up:</h3>
<p><strong>Do I think the Swedish government spend to much for the new European Presidency 2009 logo?</strong></p>
<p><em>Yes of course. </em>But it&#8217;s not about the actual cost. It&#8217;s about the entire process!</p>
<p>To me, this is about integrated communication. Do not isolate your logo work as a separate activity. If someone would have thought different about the entire process of designing this new logo they would have done just what Per said in his post “helping the target group to choose that product in front of the competition”.<em> (and saved SEK 1.1 million for other activities)</em></p>
<p>This is what innovative communication is all about. No single activity must be performed without gaining the overall objective. That means that <em>everything we do should outlive budgets and on top of that generate a social buzz and PR</em>.</p>
<p>This logo will not do that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronnestam.com/mashable-bet-2500-on-a-social-design-party-while-good-old-sweden-throws-13-million-on-the-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brand and communication predictions for 2009 by Johan Ronnestam</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/brand-and-communication-predictions-for-2009-by-johan-ronnestam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronnestam.com/brand-and-communication-predictions-for-2009-by-johan-ronnestam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ronnestam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The trend is my friend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronnestam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=1408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, inspired by ReadWriteWeb I stuck my nose out and tried to predict what 2008 would bring us in terms of trends, technology, communication and ideas. About 70% of my thoughts were confirmed but I of course missed out on some too. 2008 is coming to an end and it&#8217;s time for me to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img class="alignnone frame size-full wp-image-1412" title="predict_future_2009" src="http://www.ronnestam.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/predict_future_2009.jpg" alt="predict_future_2009" width="480" height="445" /></p>
<p><span class="drop_cap">L</span>ast year, inspired by <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9602" target="_blank">ReadWriteWeb</a> I stuck my nose out and <a href="http://www.ronnestam.com/2007/12/27/my-predictions-for-2008/" target="_self">tried to predict </a>what 2008 would bring us in terms of trends, technology, communication and ideas. About 70% of my thoughts were confirmed but I of course missed out on some too.</p>
<p>2008 is coming to an end and it&#8217;s time for me to let that poor nose of mine feel the heat again. 2009 is harder to predict than ever since we have a free falling economy in the world at the moment. How will smaller budgets effect advertising, investments in technology, self confidence and personal evolvement? Hell if I knew, but here are some ideas.<span id="more-1408"></span></p>
<h3>Here are 9 things/trends I believe you should look out for and possibly follow in 2009</h3>
<p><strong>1. Technology becomes a commodity and ideas prosper from it</strong><br />
Open Source in combination with broadband access in low cost producing countries will make companies move their technology projects outside their local markets. Companies that earn money from building content management, blogs, communities and other common systems have to move their competence from production towards ideas. Cause after all, who will pay €100 000 for a content management system when you can get <a href="http://www.typo3.com/" target="_blank">Typo3</a>, <a href="http://www.magentocommerce.com/" target="_blank">Magento</a>, <a href="http://wordpress.org/" target="_blank">WordPress</a>, <a href="http://www.pligg.com/" target="_blank">Pligg</a>, <a href="http://www.joomla.org/" target="_blank">Joomla</a>, <a href="http://drupal.org/" target="_blank">Drupal</a> and other excellent systems for free. On top of that, have people in India bidding for it and you&#8217;ll end up paying $600 instead of $60 000 for the implementation of it.</p>
<p>Making it do the right thing and look right, that&#8217;s something we wont oursource just yet. So, bet on ideas and brains.</p>
<p><strong>2. In 2009 print and outdoor advertising grow stronger while TV continues to die.</strong><br />
Analysts, brands and media agencies all say people move money from traditional advertising to digital. Personally I believe glossy magazines and outdoor locations close to standing still environments (bus-stops, squares, subways etc) will grow. These are locations where people cannot leave.</p>
<p>Solutions however will be far more customized than today and we&#8217;ll focus on fewer but better placements.</p>
<p><strong>3. Communication Capitalism is born in 2009</strong><br />
We&#8217;ll see more and more brands moving from the strategy of putting it all on one card to campaign experimentation.<br />
More brands than ever will in 2009 dare to loose control of their communication and try multiple campaigns beside each other. The ones that deliver on target will be feeded more money, the ones that doesn&#8217;t deliver are killed and new ones are born. Exactly like you would treat your stock portfolio &#8211; don&#8217;t put everything on one card.</p>
<p>In 2008 I started to call this strategy Communication Capitalism and it&#8217;s time for you to do that too cause in 2009 it&#8217;ll kick off.</p>
<p><strong>4. Online advertising suffers from lack of competence and will slow down in 2009 for the first time in years</strong><br />
Lots of brands have now tried different strategies for online advertising. While doing so they&#8217;ve gotten better at measuring their campaigns and the results doesn&#8217;t meet expectations. Flash campaigns with full screen video doesn&#8217;t give shit. Banners keep on loosing click rate. RSS feeds are great but how do you place advertising that people see inside it? Facebook advertising didn&#8217;t deliver. Adwords is kinda of nice but where&#8217;s the branding?</p>
<p>On top of this the media companies doesn&#8217;t know jack shit about what&#8217;s going on. The digital agencies produce fantastic campaigns but there&#8217;s not enough senior employees to choose communication over cool technologies. Over at the brand side the competence on digital media is in generally low and the marketing directors has to choose a communication partner. Today that partner is the traditional advertising agency mostly because of their senior employees. The problem here is that they don&#8217;t understand the digital medium &#8211; and that&#8217;s a disaster for the brands and their communication efforts.</p>
<p><em>To sum of the problem. </em></p>
<ul>
<li>There&#8217;s just not enough senior people in the world that really understand how to combine traditional and digital communication.</li>
<li>This means agencies, brands and media advisors continue to suggest the wrong things.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Result: </em>Brands will pull out of online activities due to it.</p>
<p><strong>5. SEO / SEM freelancers organize themselves</strong><br />
If you&#8217;re looking for people that truly understands SEO/SEM marketing you choice shouldn&#8217;t be a media agency or any other company for that sake. Most people out there that truly understands SEO/SEM are individuals or very small companies. The problem however for big brands is that these individuals or companies cannot cater for their needs, their basically too small.</p>
<p>In order for SEO/SEM to kick off we really need to see some sort of network that can bring all these great brains together but still let them run their own companies. Media companies are all about taking over everything. These SEO/SEM newcomers are all about networking and sharing so sooner or later something like this should come.</p>
<p><strong>6. Apple launches the iPhone Pro and starts selling iPhone and rate plans in iTunes.</strong><br />
After winning the hearts of millions around the world it&#8217;s time for Apple to launch the second generation iPhones and I believe it&#8217;ll be a Pro version of the iPhone.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see better memory capacity, more space, better keyboard, maybe even a bigger flip out screen of some kind. On top of this they&#8217;ll use the magic bullet gained by cooperating with different operators in every country world wide. They&#8217;ve more or less gotten them all to pay for the iTunes implementation and now the exclusive deals are starting to run out. Haha says Apple as they will start selling iPhones in computer shops and sell the rate plans online.<br />
<em> </em></p>
<p><em>(<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/22/iphone-nano-concept-photo/" target="_blank">Rumors say</a> that Apple will launch the iPhone Nano but I just thought it was boring to go with that one)</em></p>
<p><em>(Update: While I was writing this part,<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5119445/the-dream-iphone-pro" target="_blank"> rumors started to spread</a> about an iPhone Pro as well)</em></p>
<p><strong>7. Facebook Connect and Google Friend Connect continue to grow but Friendfeed Friends might be the winner in 2009</strong><br />
During the later part of 2008 we&#8217;ve seen how Facebook and Google has moved their positions forward to grab a larger part of the social networking cake. In the background however lurks Friendfeed. It&#8217;s quickly growing and the people that use <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/connect.php" target="_blank">Facebook Connect</a> of <a href="http://www.google.com/friendconnect/" target="_blank">Google Friend Connect</a> would probably welcome a social connector from someone else than the big ones and use that one more. <a href="http://friendfeed.com/" target="_blank">Friendfeed</a> could and will be that third party.</p>
<p>Why not call it Friendfeed Friends?</p>
<p><strong>8. Branding is being reevaluated in 2009</strong><br />
Digital communication is totally revamping the landscape of telling people about your brand. The base of brand strategies will remain the same but the tactical part of it &#8211; treatment of logotypes, typefaces, colors, graphical guidelines and who officially represent a brand will change.</p>
<p>In 2009 we&#8217;ll se more brand than ever that let their corporate guidelines loose and start experimenting. As more and more brand activities get digitized brands will learn that it&#8217;s not about the graphical guidelines but instead about keeping the conversation alive. </p>
<p>In 2009 branding becomes being a personality and personalities change constantly but their heart and spine stay the same. You might say that this is not something new but until now most brands believe their brand manual is the guide to heaven when it&#8217;s actually the guide to hell. In 2009 this old fashioned way of communicating your brand will change.</p>
<p><strong>9. Mashups grow up and conquer the corporate world.<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">This year we&#8217;ve seen how a lot of sites turned into mashups. </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>A mashup is about creating one place where visitors can view content from sources like YouTube, Flickr, Del.icio.us, Twitter, Facebook and much more. </em></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Until now most of the good mashup sites has been personal websites or web 2.0 companies. In 2009 we&#8217;ll see how large brands like Nike, Diesel, adidas, Apple, Coca Cola, Disney, GM, Puma, Ikea, Samsung, Absolut and more will turn their websites into mashups. </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">All kind of brands will see the benefit of not hosting your videos inhouse but instead creating channels on multimple social video platforms. Your images will be better spread if placed on Flickr. That corporate blog of yours works better if it&#8217;s running on WordPress and mashed into your and your partners websites. Sites like <a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/" target="_blank">Yahoo Pipes</a> and <a href="http://tarpipe.com/">Tarpipe</a> will do wonders for the social spread and suddenly you find your brand site being turned into a true web 2.0 entity.</span></strong></p>
<p> </p>
<h3><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>So, there we are. Nothing else to do this year now but wishing you all <span style="color: #993366;">a happy new year.</span> May 2009 be as interesting as this year has been.</strong></span></h3>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em></em></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>See you next year &#8211; Johan Ronnestam</em></span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronnestam.com/brand-and-communication-predictions-for-2009-by-johan-ronnestam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

