<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear The Economist &#8211; it’s MY thinking space, not yours!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/</link>
	<description>Innovative communication and advertising from Sweden with love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:28:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rem</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-16921</link>
		<dc:creator>rem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-16921</guid>
		<description>Hi, I was contacted  by a guy from We are social to be part of this campaign and I had the same impression of yours: is it a campaign for the Economist of for Spotify? And why using a stunning flash web site in which you can only say ohhhhhh and nothing else, whitout any chance to really interact with others? The company is named We are social but it does not seem to be very &quot;social&quot; in practice. I asked the guy these questions and he said the presence of Spotify was casual, just one of the many softwars used for sharing music on line and  the decision of using Flash was not taken by them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I was contacted  by a guy from We are social to be part of this campaign and I had the same impression of yours: is it a campaign for the Economist of for Spotify? And why using a stunning flash web site in which you can only say ohhhhhh and nothing else, whitout any chance to really interact with others? The company is named We are social but it does not seem to be very &#8220;social&#8221; in practice. I asked the guy these questions and he said the presence of Spotify was casual, just one of the many softwars used for sharing music on line and  the decision of using Flash was not taken by them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rem</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-24060</link>
		<dc:creator>rem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-24060</guid>
		<description>Hi, I was contacted  by a guy from We are social to be part of this campaign and I had the same impression of yours: is it a campaign for the Economist of for Spotify? And why using a stunning flash web site in which you can only say ohhhhhh and nothing else, whitout any chance to really interact with others? The company is named We are social but it does not seem to be very &quot;social&quot; in practice. I asked the guy these questions and he said the presence of Spotify was casual, just one of the many softwars used for sharing music on line and  the decision of using Flash was not taken by them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I was contacted  by a guy from We are social to be part of this campaign and I had the same impression of yours: is it a campaign for the Economist of for Spotify? And why using a stunning flash web site in which you can only say ohhhhhh and nothing else, whitout any chance to really interact with others? The company is named We are social but it does not seem to be very &#8220;social&#8221; in practice. I asked the guy these questions and he said the presence of Spotify was casual, just one of the many softwars used for sharing music on line and  the decision of using Flash was not taken by them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronnestam</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-16781</link>
		<dc:creator>ronnestam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-16781</guid>
		<description>Eskimon and Melina,

Thanks for your comments. I&#039;ll get right to them once my vacation slowly moves into a working type of thing. Until then, have the best of times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eskimon and Melina,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. I&#8217;ll get right to them once my vacation slowly moves into a working type of thing. Until then, have the best of times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronnestam</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-24059</link>
		<dc:creator>ronnestam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-24059</guid>
		<description>Eskimon and Melina,

Thanks for your comments. I&#039;ll get right to them once my vacation slowly moves into a working type of thing. Until then, have the best of times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eskimon and Melina,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. I&#8217;ll get right to them once my vacation slowly moves into a working type of thing. Until then, have the best of times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melina Hägglund Alanko</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-16480</link>
		<dc:creator>Melina Hägglund Alanko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-16480</guid>
		<description>Hej Johan,

Thanks for your honest assessment of the campaign (at least we’ve been successful in creating a debate!).

It’s our hope that the Thinking Space will be a place where opinion leaders from all over Europe will share their way of thinking and how they get their ideas. Our belief is that your readers as well as new readers would have been interested in reading about the way you get your ideas, and the questions were meant to be a starting point to inspire. The link exchange element is designed so that bloggers’ spaces are displayed on other blogs that take part in the project, meaning everyone’s posts are exposed to a wider audience of people than just their own readers.

Anyway – I’m sorry we didn’t solve the problem from your perspective, but I hope you can see our intentions were in good faith. It was good to get your feedback and keep on enjoying your summer!

Med vänliga hälsningar,
Melina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej Johan,</p>
<p>Thanks for your honest assessment of the campaign (at least we’ve been successful in creating a debate!).</p>
<p>It’s our hope that the Thinking Space will be a place where opinion leaders from all over Europe will share their way of thinking and how they get their ideas. Our belief is that your readers as well as new readers would have been interested in reading about the way you get your ideas, and the questions were meant to be a starting point to inspire. The link exchange element is designed so that bloggers’ spaces are displayed on other blogs that take part in the project, meaning everyone’s posts are exposed to a wider audience of people than just their own readers.</p>
<p>Anyway – I’m sorry we didn’t solve the problem from your perspective, but I hope you can see our intentions were in good faith. It was good to get your feedback and keep on enjoying your summer!</p>
<p>Med vänliga hälsningar,<br />
Melina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melina Hägglund Alanko</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-24058</link>
		<dc:creator>Melina Hägglund Alanko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-24058</guid>
		<description>Hej Johan,

Thanks for your honest assessment of the campaign (at least we’ve been successful in creating a debate!).

It’s our hope that the Thinking Space will be a place where opinion leaders from all over Europe will share their way of thinking and how they get their ideas. Our belief is that your readers as well as new readers would have been interested in reading about the way you get your ideas, and the questions were meant to be a starting point to inspire. The link exchange element is designed so that bloggers’ spaces are displayed on other blogs that take part in the project, meaning everyone’s posts are exposed to a wider audience of people than just their own readers.

Anyway – I’m sorry we didn’t solve the problem from your perspective, but I hope you can see our intentions were in good faith. It was good to get your feedback and keep on enjoying your summer!

Med vänliga hälsningar,
Melina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej Johan,</p>
<p>Thanks for your honest assessment of the campaign (at least we’ve been successful in creating a debate!).</p>
<p>It’s our hope that the Thinking Space will be a place where opinion leaders from all over Europe will share their way of thinking and how they get their ideas. Our belief is that your readers as well as new readers would have been interested in reading about the way you get your ideas, and the questions were meant to be a starting point to inspire. The link exchange element is designed so that bloggers’ spaces are displayed on other blogs that take part in the project, meaning everyone’s posts are exposed to a wider audience of people than just their own readers.</p>
<p>Anyway – I’m sorry we didn’t solve the problem from your perspective, but I hope you can see our intentions were in good faith. It was good to get your feedback and keep on enjoying your summer!</p>
<p>Med vänliga hälsningar,<br />
Melina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surftips</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-16474</link>
		<dc:creator>Surftips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-16474</guid>
		<description>[...] Dear The Economist – it’s MY thinking space, not yours!Johan Ronnestam rockar! Gör om, gör rätt! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear The Economist – it’s MY thinking space, not yours!Johan Ronnestam rockar! Gör om, gör rätt! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eskimon</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-16463</link>
		<dc:creator>eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-16463</guid>
		<description>Hej Johan,

An interesting perspective on this campaign - and clearly different from my experience!

Perhaps the difference is that you were asked to blog about it (always a silly idea), whereas I stumbled upon the site by accident, and just found it engaging. 

Sure, I was complimentary about the site in my post, but that&#039;s because I was impressed by it (as I explain here: http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/). I didn&#039;t expect anything in return for that post  though - I just wanted to share something that I found interesting.

However, I relate to your frustrations. If I&#039;d been asked to blog about it, I probably wouldn&#039;t even have written about it, let alone commended it. 

Brands (and agencies) need to produce content that people will choose to talk about of their own accord, not just pester them to talk about their stuff for the sake of it. Like you say, what&#039;s the benefit to the blogger?

I still think the core site is great, but I&#039;m disappointed by this &#039;request&#039; aspect, which seems to go against the spirit of the site (which I interpreted as creative inspiration). 

A great example of &quot;what worked well, what could have been better&quot;.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej Johan,</p>
<p>An interesting perspective on this campaign &#8211; and clearly different from my experience!</p>
<p>Perhaps the difference is that you were asked to blog about it (always a silly idea), whereas I stumbled upon the site by accident, and just found it engaging. </p>
<p>Sure, I was complimentary about the site in my post, but that&#8217;s because I was impressed by it (as I explain here: <a href="http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/)" rel="nofollow">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/)</a>. I didn&#8217;t expect anything in return for that post  though &#8211; I just wanted to share something that I found interesting.</p>
<p>However, I relate to your frustrations. If I&#8217;d been asked to blog about it, I probably wouldn&#8217;t even have written about it, let alone commended it. </p>
<p>Brands (and agencies) need to produce content that people will choose to talk about of their own accord, not just pester them to talk about their stuff for the sake of it. Like you say, what&#8217;s the benefit to the blogger?</p>
<p>I still think the core site is great, but I&#8217;m disappointed by this &#8216;request&#8217; aspect, which seems to go against the spirit of the site (which I interpreted as creative inspiration). </p>
<p>A great example of &#8220;what worked well, what could have been better&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eskimon</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-24056</link>
		<dc:creator>eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-24056</guid>
		<description>Hej Johan,

An interesting perspective on this campaign - and clearly different from my experience!

Perhaps the difference is that you were asked to blog about it (always a silly idea), whereas I stumbled upon the site by accident, and just found it engaging. 

Sure, I was complimentary about the site in my post, but that&#039;s because I was impressed by it (as I explain here: http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/). I didn&#039;t expect anything in return for that post  though - I just wanted to share something that I found interesting.

However, I relate to your frustrations. If I&#039;d been asked to blog about it, I probably wouldn&#039;t even have written about it, let alone commended it. 

Brands (and agencies) need to produce content that people will choose to talk about of their own accord, not just pester them to talk about their stuff for the sake of it. Like you say, what&#039;s the benefit to the blogger?

I still think the core site is great, but I&#039;m disappointed by this &#039;request&#039; aspect, which seems to go against the spirit of the site (which I interpreted as creative inspiration). 

A great example of &quot;what worked well, what could have been better&quot;.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej Johan,</p>
<p>An interesting perspective on this campaign &#8211; and clearly different from my experience!</p>
<p>Perhaps the difference is that you were asked to blog about it (always a silly idea), whereas I stumbled upon the site by accident, and just found it engaging. </p>
<p>Sure, I was complimentary about the site in my post, but that&#8217;s because I was impressed by it (as I explain here: <a href="http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/)" rel="nofollow">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/)</a>. I didn&#8217;t expect anything in return for that post  though &#8211; I just wanted to share something that I found interesting.</p>
<p>However, I relate to your frustrations. If I&#8217;d been asked to blog about it, I probably wouldn&#8217;t even have written about it, let alone commended it. </p>
<p>Brands (and agencies) need to produce content that people will choose to talk about of their own accord, not just pester them to talk about their stuff for the sake of it. Like you say, what&#8217;s the benefit to the blogger?</p>
<p>I still think the core site is great, but I&#8217;m disappointed by this &#8216;request&#8217; aspect, which seems to go against the spirit of the site (which I interpreted as creative inspiration). </p>
<p>A great example of &#8220;what worked well, what could have been better&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eskimon</title>
		<link>http://www.ronnestam.com/dear-the-economist-it%e2%80%99s-my-thinking-space-not-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-24057</link>
		<dc:creator>eskimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronnestam.com/?p=2890#comment-24057</guid>
		<description>Hej Johan,

An interesting perspective on this campaign - and clearly different from my experience!

Perhaps the difference is that you were asked to blog about it (always a silly idea), whereas I stumbled upon the site by accident, and just found it engaging. 

Sure, I was complimentary about the site in my post, but that&#039;s because I was impressed by it (as I explain here: http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/). I didn&#039;t expect anything in return for that post  though - I just wanted to share something that I found interesting.

However, I relate to your frustrations. If I&#039;d been asked to blog about it, I probably wouldn&#039;t even have written about it, let alone commended it. 

Brands (and agencies) need to produce content that people will choose to talk about of their own accord, not just pester them to talk about their stuff for the sake of it. Like you say, what&#039;s the benefit to the blogger?

I still think the core site is great, but I&#039;m disappointed by this &#039;request&#039; aspect, which seems to go against the spirit of the site (which I interpreted as creative inspiration). 

A great example of &quot;what worked well, what could have been better&quot;.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hej Johan,</p>
<p>An interesting perspective on this campaign &#8211; and clearly different from my experience!</p>
<p>Perhaps the difference is that you were asked to blog about it (always a silly idea), whereas I stumbled upon the site by accident, and just found it engaging. </p>
<p>Sure, I was complimentary about the site in my post, but that&#8217;s because I was impressed by it (as I explain here: <a href="http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/)" rel="nofollow">http://eskimon.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/thinking-space/)</a>. I didn&#8217;t expect anything in return for that post  though &#8211; I just wanted to share something that I found interesting.</p>
<p>However, I relate to your frustrations. If I&#8217;d been asked to blog about it, I probably wouldn&#8217;t even have written about it, let alone commended it. </p>
<p>Brands (and agencies) need to produce content that people will choose to talk about of their own accord, not just pester them to talk about their stuff for the sake of it. Like you say, what&#8217;s the benefit to the blogger?</p>
<p>I still think the core site is great, but I&#8217;m disappointed by this &#8216;request&#8217; aspect, which seems to go against the spirit of the site (which I interpreted as creative inspiration). </p>
<p>A great example of &#8220;what worked well, what could have been better&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
